MEASURING USER SATISFACTION AND NET BENEFIT OF SAKTI SYSTEM: LESSONS FROM STAKEHOLDERS OF REGIONAL TREASURY OFFICE IN RIAU PROVINCE

Winarni Rahayu, Sudarno Sudarno, Dadi Komardi

Abstract


"User satisfaction" is always an important measure of a stakeholder's opinion of e-government and must cover the entire stakeholder experience. "Net benefits" are the most important success factor of implementation system information and can measure the balance of positive and negative impacts of the e-government like the SAKTI system. This study aims to analyze the influence of service quality, information quality, system quality, organizational support, and regulatory environment on user satisfaction and net benefits of SAKTI users. This quantitative study uses primary data in questionnaires distributed to respondents through google forms and interviews. The questionnaire used simple random sampling. The sample size in this study was 482. The data were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using Partial Least Square (PLS), namely SmartPLS version 3.2.9. The hypothesis test results show that system quality significantly and strongly impacts user satisfaction. Information quality has a large and strong impact on user satisfaction. Service quality has a large and strong impact on user satisfaction. Organizational support has a small and weak impact on user satisfaction. The regulatory environment has a large and strong impetus for user satisfaction. User satisfaction, influenced by service quality, information quality, system quality, organizational support, and the regulatory environment, strongly impacts the net On Stakeholders of the Regional Treasury Office in Riau Province. The research model can use to conduct surveys of user satisfaction on SAKTI or other e-government and evaluate the results.

Keywords


e-government; SAKTI System; User Satisfaction; Net Benefit; SmartPLS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Athmay, AlaaAldin, A., Fantazy, K., and Kumar, V. 2016. EGovernment Adoption and User's Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation. EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(1), pp. 57–83. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-05-2014-0016.

Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., and Batiha, K. 2013. Measuring User Satisfaction from E-Government Services: Lessons from Jordan. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), pp. 277–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.001.

Al-Kaseasbeh, Mohammad, H., Harada, Y., Naiemah, U., and Saraih, B. 2019. E-Government Services Assessment from the Perspective of Citizens Interaction and Satisfaction in Jordan: Pilot Study. International Journal of Research and Review, Vol.6, 6(December), 12. www.ijrrjournal.com

Alruwaie and Mubarak, O. B. H. O. 2014. A Framework for Evaluating Citizens' Continued Intention to Use Public Sector Online Services. Brunel University London (June).

Amriani, T. N. and Iskandar, A. 2019. Analisis Kesuksesan Implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) pada Satuan Kerja di Lingkungan Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan (BPPK). Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 3(1), pp. 54–74. DOI: 10.31685/kek.v3i1.409.

Anwar, M., Esichaikul, V., Rehman, M., and Anjum, M. 2016. E-Government Services Evaluation from Citizen Satisfaction Perspective: A Case of Afghanistan. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 10(1), pp. 139–67. DOI: 10.1108/TG-03-2015-0017.

Arifiantika, Janis. 2015. Analisis Tingkat Keberhasilan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keuangan Daerah melalui Model Delonea and Mcleane. Vol. 11.

Baker, Jeff. 2012. Informations Systems Theory: Vol.2. American University of Sharjah 28 (January 2011), pp. 461. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2.

Chen, Y. C., Hu, L. T., Tseng, K. C., Juang, W. J., and Chang, C. K. 2019. Cross-Boundary e-Government Systems: Determinants of Performance. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), pp. 449–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.001.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), pp. 60–95. DOI: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 9-30, M.E. Sharpe Inc.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2016. Information Systems Success Measurement. Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, 2(1), pp. 1–116. DOI: 10.1561/2900000005.

Duryadi. 2021. Metode Penelitian Empiris Model Path Analysis dan Analisis Menggunakan SmartPLS. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., and Sowa, D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp. 500–507.

Erica, D. and Rasyid, H. A. 2018. Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi terhadap Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan Jasa Transportasi Online di Jakarta. Jurnal Ecodemica, 19 No. 2(2), pp. 168–176.

Erimalata, S. 2016. Pendekatan Hot-Fit Framework dalam Generalized Structural Component Analysis pada Sistem Informasi Manajemen Barang Milik Daerah: Sebuah Pengujian Efek Resiprokal. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, 17(2), pp. 141–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2016.0051.

Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., and Chan, T. 2003. Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model. Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (2000), pp. 576–91.

Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., and Chan, T. 2008. Re-Conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), pp. 377–408. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00164.

Gangwar, H., Hema, D., and Ramaswamy, R. 2015. Understanding Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption Using an Integrated TAM-TOE Model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), pp. 107-30.

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Peneliti Universitas Diponegoro.

Halawi, L., McCarthy, R., and Aronson, J. 2007. An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management Systems' Success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), pp. 121–35. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2008.11646014.

Harjito, Y., Achyani, F., and Payamta. 2015. Implementasi E-Procurement Ditinjau dari Kesuksesan Sistem Teknologi Informasi dengan menggunakan Model Delone dan Mclean. 1.

Harnowo, S., Santoso, B., and Suryani, E. 2021. Determinan Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI): Pendekatan Human-Organization-Technology (HOT) Fit Framework. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(3), pp. 769. DOI: 10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i03.p19.

Haryani, P. 2016. Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan E-Government Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta dengan Metode E-GovQual Modifikasi.

Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., and Elahi, S. 2012. A Model for Measuring E-Learning Systems Success in Universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), pp. 10959–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028.

Hedström, K., Kolkowska, E., Karlsson, F., and Allen, J. P. 2011. Value Conflicts for Information Security Management. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), pp. 373–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2011.06.001.

Iivari, Juhani. 2005. An Empirical Test of the DeLone-McLean Model of Information System Success. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), pp. 8–27. DOI: 10.1145/1066149.1066152.

Indonesia. 2003. Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government.

Indonesia. 2021. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 171/PMK.05/2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Sistem SAKTI.

Iskandar, A., Amriani, T. N., and Subekan, A. 2016. Evaluasi atas Implementasi Aplikasi Sistem Akuntansi Instansi Basis Akrual (Saiba) pada Mitra Kerja KPPN Gorontalo dan Marisa. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara (Desember). DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.65.

Jiang and Ji. 2014. E-Government Web Portal Adoption: The Effects of Service Quality. E-Service Journal, 9(3): pp. 43. DOI: 10.2979/eservicej.9.3.43.

Kader, M. A. R. A. and Ali, R. 2012. Evaluating the Provision of Information System Performance in the Public Education Sector: An Extension of DeLone and Mclean Model. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences, 16(1), pp. 1–22.

Kara, Riri Novita. 2018. Pengaruh Penggunaan dan User Satisfaction E-Filling terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis.

Muharor, A. Fitriah, L. N., and Sub Bagian Keuangan Pengadilan Tinggi Mataram. 2015. Determinan Kesuksesan Aplikasi Sia Komdanas Pada Satuan Kerja Di Koordinator Wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Mataram. Vol. 11.

Nasution, B. A., Erlina, Lumbanraja, P., and Muda, I. 2022. Analysis of Adaptive Model Success of Integrated Financial Information System through User Satisfaction in Local Governments. Webology, Volume 19, No. 1, January 2022. DOI: 10.14704/WEB/V19I1/WEB19194.

Nasrudin, E. and Widagdo, A. K. 2020. Determinan User Satisfaction Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Individu dan Organisasi. Jurnal Manajemen Perbendaharaan, 1(1), pp. 69–94. DOI: 10.33105/jmp.v1i1.351.

Neves, P. and Eisenberger, R. 2014. Perceived Organizational Support and Risk Taking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), pp. 187-205. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-07-2011-0021.

Oliver, Riscrd L. 1997. Satisfaction A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill Education, Singapore.

Parasuruman A., Berry, L. L., and Zeithaml, V. A. 1991. Understanding Customer Expectations of Service. Sloan Management Review, 32(3), pp. 39–49.

Petter, S., DeLone, W., and McLean, E. 2008. Measuring Information Systems Success: Models, Dimensions, Measures, and Interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), pp. 236–63. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.15.

Prakoso, Bondan Sapta. 2018. Kepuasan Layanan Online E-Government Di Kementerian Agama Indonesia.

Prihanto, I. G., Riyanto, B., Gunawan, H., Jamil, A., Surahman, A., and Haris, A. I. 2022. The Effect of Service Quality and User Satisfaction on User Loyalty of Information and Communication Technology in Lapan. Journal of Positive School Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 3083–3093.

Priyo, D., Lilik, W. R., and Purwanti. 2018. Determinan Kepuasan Sistem Perbendaharaan dan Anggaran Negara (Studi Pada Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan). Vol. 5.

Pudjianto, B., Zo, H., Ciganek, A. P., and Rho, J. J. 2011. Determinants of E-Government Assimilation in Indonesia : An Empirical Investigation using a TOE Framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 21 (1), pp. 49–80.

Seddon, P. B. 1997. A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), pp. 240–53.

Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. 1996. A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of Success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, Vol 4 No. 1(1). DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2769.

Sihotang, J. S. 2020. Vol. 11 No.1 Agustus 2020. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Publik, 11(1), pp. 1–9.

Spears, J. L. and Barki, H. 2010. Quarterly in Information Systems User Participation Security Risk Management. Jstor, 34(3), pp. 503–22.

Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., and Stergioulas, L. K. 2008. An Evaluation Framework for Health Information Systems: Human, Organization and Technology-Fit Factors (HOT-Fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), pp. 386-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011.

Zai, S. N. P. and Dewi, A. F. 2014. Pengaruh Pentingnya Sistem, System Quality dan Information Quality terhadap Kegunaan dan User Satisfaction dalam Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Kasus di RSUP Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro Klaten). Yogyakarta, Unversitas Negeri Yogyakarta (1992).

Zaidi, S. K. R., Henderson, C. D., and Gupta, G. 2017. The Moderating Effect of Culture on E-Filing Taxes: Evidence from India. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Xu, S., and Dedrick, J. 2004. Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), pp. 17–54. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045797.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.1.18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.