ACCURACY LEVEL OF CAPM AND APT MODELS IN DETERMINING THE EXPECTED RETURN OF STOCK LISTED ON LQ45 INDEX
Abstract
This study determines the accuracy level of CAPM and APT in determining the expected return of LQ45 and comparing the expected return from CAPM and APT models. This study uses descriptive and comparative research approaches. The population is all stocks listed in the LQ45 index while the sampling method used is purposive sampling with stock criteria that have complete data for the period November 2015 - November 2019. This study uses an independent sample t-test in testing the expected return differences between the CAPM and APT models. The result showed that the CAPM Model was more accurate in determining the expected return of LQ45 stocks compared to the CAPM method. The result also showed that there was a significant difference in expected return between CAPM and APT models. Based on this result, investors can use the CAPM model in predicting the returns of the stock listed on the LQ45. For further research, can use another index in the capital market as a research object, used a longer period to get a more accurate result, and add some more macro variables.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, Kamaruddin. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Investasi dan Portofolio. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Aqli, M. Irsyadul. 2015. Analisis Perbandingan Keakuratan Metode Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) dan Arbitrase Pricing Theory (APT) dalam memprediksi return saham. eprints. walisongo.ac.id/5495/.
Heizer, Rey and Reinder. 2009. Manajemen Operasi. Edisi Ke-9. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ibrahim, Muhammad I., J. Titaley, and T. Manurung. 2017. Analsiis Keakuratan Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) dan Arbitrase Pricing Theory (APT) dalam memprediksi Expected Saham pada LQ45. JdC, 6 (1), 30-43.
Indra, Yetti Afrida. 2018. Perbandingan Keakuratan Metode Capital Asset Pricing Model dan Arbitrage Pricing Theory dalam memprediksi return saham (Studi pada Perusahaan Sektor Barang Konsumsi dan Sektor Pertambangan yang terdaftar di Indeks Saham Syariah Indonesia (ISSI) Periode 20132016). Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 1 (2), 233-240.
Jogiyanto. Hartono. 2016. Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. Edisi kesepuluh. Yogyakarta: BPFEYogyakarta.
Lemiyana. 2015. Analisis Model CAPM dan APT dalam Memprediksi Tingkat Return Saham Syariah (Studi kasus Saham di Jakarta Islamic Index). I-Finance, 1 (2).
Noor, Juliansyah. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian : Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi & Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Sharpe, William F., Alexander, Gordon J., and Bailey, Jeffery V. 2005. Investasi. Edisi ke enam. Jilid 1. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Silalahi, Ulber. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.
Tandelilin, Eduardus. 2017. Pasar Modal: Manajemen Portofolio & Investasi. Yogyakarta: PT. kanisius.
Yunita, Irni. 2018. Analysis and Level of Accuracy Comparison Between Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) In Determining the Expected Return of Shares in Jakarta Islamic Index. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication (IJSRP), 8 (5).
Zubir, Zalmi. 2011. Manajemen Portofolio: Penerapannya dalam Investasi Saham. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.04.17
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.