Mentoring dan Coaching sebagai Strategi Pengembangan Pendidikan Kewirausahaan: Studi Fenomenologi

Oscarius Yudhi Ari Wijaya, Wirawan ED Radianto

Abstract


Entrepreneurship has been gained attention at the institutions of higher education in Indonesia. The entrepreneurship courses is a necessity for college student. The qualitative research with phenomenology was trying to explore the effectiveness of Mentoring and Coaching Strategy in the process of looking for ideas and transferring knowledge to the learners (students) during the Entrepreneurship education. Mentoring and Coaching have differences and similarities, briefly mentoring has a meaning giving direction and coaching meanslooking for ideas / opinions of students in solving problems that occur in the project based learning experienced by students.The problem occurs in the educator (facilitator) is to answer the question whether it should be mentoring or coaching.The findings in this study indicate that the facilitators have more difficulty in doing coaching than mentoring and in the process of coaching is not allowed to give advice to the studentbecause all the settlement ideas must come from their own and there are still many facilitators were doing more mentoring than coaching.


Keywords


mentoring,coaching, entrepreneurship education, project based learning, interactive control

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, R.N., and Young, D.W. 2003. Management Control in Nonprotif Organization 7th. New York: McGraw- Hill.

Anthony, R.N., and Govindarajan, V. 2007. Management Control System 12th. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Birnberg, J.G. 1998. Some Reflections on The Evelution of Organizational Control. Behavioral Research in Accounting, suppl, pp. 27-46.

Bruining, H., Bonnet, M., Wright, M. 2004. Management control systems and strategy change in buyouts. Management Accounting Research , Vol. 15 , pp: 155– 177

Campbell, A., Lindsay, D.H., Garner, D.E., Tan, K.B. 2010. “The Impact of Merit Pay on Researh Outcomes For Accounting Professors” Contemporary Issues in Education Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp:55–62.

Davila, A., Foster, G., Li, M. 2009. Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, pp. 322–347.

Davila, T. 2000. An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25, pp: 383–409.

Flamholtz, E.G., Das, T.K., & Tsui, A. 1985. Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations & Society, vol. 10, pp. 35–50.

Grant, H. 1998. “Academic contests?: Merit pay in Canadian universities”, Relations Industrielles, Fall, vol. 53 no. 4, pp: 647–667.

Hallinger, P. 2010. “Using Faculty Evaluation to Improve Teaching Quality: A longitudinal case study of higher education in Southeast Asia”, Education Assessment Evaluation Accounting, Vol. 22, pp: 253–274.

Hoque, Z., Chia, M. 2012. Competitive forces and the levers of control framework in a manufacturing setting A tale of a multinational subsidiary. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 123–145.

Horngren, C., Sundem, G., and Stratton, W. 2005. Introduction to Management Accounting. New Jersey: Pearson.

Irs, R. 2012. ”Pay-for-performance in Estonian general educational schools: the situation for further development”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 7 Iss: 3 pp. 302–332.

Ismail, T. 2013. Formatting Strategy and Management Control System: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 196–205.

Kimura dan Mourdoukourtas. 2000. Effective Integration of Management Control Systems for Competing in Global Industries. European Business Review. Vol. 12, number. 1, pp. 41–45.

Lindsay, D.H., Campbell, A., Tan, K.B. 2009. “The Impact of Merit Pay on Teaching Outcomes”, Research in Higher Education Journal, vol. 2, pp:1–10.

Marginson, D.E.W. 2002. Management control systems and their effects on strategy formation at middle-management levels: evidence from a U.K. organization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11). pp. 1019– 1031.

Merchant, Stedee. 2007. Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation, and Incentives. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall.

Overell, S. 2004. “Academic Reward in The Firing Line”. Personnel Today, November, pp: 20–21.

Schulz, E.R., Tanguay, D.M., (2006) “Merit Pay in a Public Higher Education Institution: Questions of Impact and Attitudes”. Public Personnel Management, Spring, Vol. 35, no. 1, pp: 71–88.

Simons, R. 1995. Levers of Control, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Terpstra, D.E., Honoree, A.L. 2008. “Faculty Perceptions of Problems with Merit Pay Plans in Institutions of Higher Education”, Journal of Business and Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp: 44 59.

Terpstra, D.E., Honoree, A.L. 2009. “Merit Pay Plans in Higher Education Institutions: Characteristics and Effects”, Public Personnel Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp: 55–77.

Turk, K. 2007. “Performance Appraisal and the Compensation of Academic Staff in the University of Tartu”, Baltic Journal of Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp: 40– 54

Wongkaew, W. 2013. Management Accounting and Control Systems-Unnecessary Evils to Innovation? Chulalongkorn Business Review. Vol. 34(3). Pp: 1–21.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.