Kebijakan Harga dan Kebijakan Distribusi dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Industri Urea

. Subhan, Ujang Sumarwan, Arief Daryanto, . Kirbrandoko

Abstract


Abstract: Urea is a chemical compound which is composed from the elements of carbon, hydrogen,oxygenand nitrogen. Approximately 90% of the urea used as chemical fertilizers in the form of prills as a supplier of nitrogen element (macro nutrient) needed by the plants. Fertilizer includes in the manufacturing industry that provides a major contribution to Gross Domestic Product (PDB) after the agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries, and mining sector (BPS, 2012). In the group of non oil and gas,fertilizer industry group is rank1 of 9 industry groups which have the opportunity to generate foreign exchange.The problems faced by the fertilizer industry in Indonesia are: (1) the availability of raw materials for producing urea namely natural gas, (2) the factory has been an old age and the old technology so that inefficient, (3) very low domestic sales policycauses the loss of opportunities for manufacturers to get the maximum margin. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the income and profit in increasing the competitiveness of urea industry. The research to determine the relationship of competitiveness and the factors thataffectcompetitiveness is analyzed with multiple linear regression with the method of Ordinary Least Squared (OLS). As the independent  variable it is the price policy (domestic price and export price) and the distribution policy (production volume and export volume) and the dependent variable are the competitiveness and the results of sales as the intervening variable. The data use in this research is secondary datacoming from the annual report of PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) and Urea Outlook from Fertecon Analysis. The results showed that the price policy (domestic price and export  price) and the distribution policy (production volume and export volume) are significantly influences toward the income and the profit that will increase and stregthen the company’s competitiveness. For the domestic price variables did not significantly affect the results of sales(income) so that the policy of domestic price regulation is the same as the export price that will increase the income and the competitiveness of company. While the production volume and the export volume inflluence the results of sales so that it strengthens the competitiveness of company.


Keywords


price policy, distribution policy, competitiveness; incom; profit; and strategy to compete

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, B., Hamilton, G. 2000. Urea Strategy PT.Pupuk Sriwidjaja (Holding). Jakarta (ID): Laporan Hasil Studi Konsultan Pemasaran PT Pupuk Sriwidjaja.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2012. Statistik Indonesia Tahun 2011. Jakarta (ID). Jakarta: BPS.

Boyd, H.W., Jr, Orville, C.W. Jr. 1992. Marketing Management: A Strategic Approach. Illinois (US): Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Chen, K., Duan, Y. 1999. Competitiveness of Agri-food Exports Against ompetitors in Asia: 1980-97. Canada (CA): Project Report, Department of rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmond.

Cravens, Percy, NF. 2003. Strategic Marketing. London (GB): Seventh Edition, Mc-Grow Hill Irwin.

Day, G.S. 1999. Market Driven Strategy: Process for Creating Value. Phoenix (US): Free Press a Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Elenor, V.S. 2002. Urea Price Up on Depleting Inventories and Rising Natural Gas Price. Journal Chemical Market Report. 262 (Jul 15):19–20.

Fertecon. 2013. Urea Outlook and Ammonia Outlook 2012. Nitrogen Report Magazine London. Quarter 4(1).

Hansen, M. 2001. Manajemen Biaya, Buku II. Terjemahan Benyamin Molan. Jakarta (ID): Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Holdershaw, G., Garland. 1997. The Widespread Use of Odd Pricing in the Retail Sector. Marketing Bulletin. 1(8): 53–58, Research Note 1.

Juanda, B. 2009. Ekonometrika. Permodelan dan Pendugaan. Bogor (ID). IPB Press.

Kotabe, M., Helsen, K. 2000. Global Marketing Management. Fourth Edition. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G. 2008. Principle of Marketing. New Jersey (US): 12 Edition. Pearson Prentice- Hall. Inc.

Kotler, P. 1997. Marketing Management: Analysis, Plan- th ning, Implementation, and Control. New Jrsey (US): Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mulyadi. 2005. Sistem Manajemen Strategik Berbasis Balance Scorecard. Yogyakarta (ID): UPP AMP YPKN. Yogyakarta.

Parthasaraty, N.S. 1994. Demand Forcasting for Fertilizer Marketing. Rome (IT): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.

Price Water House Coopers. 2003. PT Pupuk Sriwidjaja Performance Audit Report. Jakarta (ID).

Laporan Hasil Audit. Pupuk Indonesia (Persero). 2013. Laporan Tahunan Tahun 2012. Jakarta (ID).

Annual Repot PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) Tahun 2013.

Pupuk Sriwidjaja (Persero). 2009. Sinergy for Creating Values. Jakarta (ID). PT Pupuk Sriwidjaja (Persero).

Purwantini, S., dan Rusdiansyah, A. 2011. Pengembangan Model Kompetisi penetapan Harga secara Dinamis Berbasis Waktu dan Persediaan Kursi untuk Penerbangan Paralel pada Low Cost Carrier dengan Mempertimbangkan Harga Tiket Kompetitor [Tesis] Surabaya (ID): Teknik Industri, Institut T knologi Sepuluh November (ITS).

Rachbini, W. 2006. Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan Pupuk terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Pupuk dan sektor Pertanian di Indonesia [Disertasi]. Bogor (ID): Sekolah Pasca Sarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Secapramana, V. 2000. Model dalam Strategi Penetapan Harga. Surabaya (ID): Unitas 9(1).

Sekaran, U. 2000. Research Methods for Business. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Stremersch, T. 2002. Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing. Journal of Marketing. 23(66):55–72.

Sumarwan. 2011. Perilaku Konsumen. Teori dan Penerapannya dalam Pemasara. Jakarta (ID): Penerbit Ghalia, Jakarta Indonesia.

Tjiptono, F. 2008. Pemasaran Strategic. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Widadie, F., dan Sutanto, A. 2012. Model Ekonomi Perberasan: Analisis Integrasi Pasar dan Simulasi Kebijakan Harga. SEPA 8(2): 51-182. ISSN: 1829-9946.

Wil, J.J., Wild, K.L., Han, J.C.Y. 2008. International Business the Challenges of Globalitation. New Yersey (US). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Zaribaf. 2008. Pricing Challenges in Global Marketing: a Model for Export Pricing. International Journal of Management Perspectives. 2(1): 24-30. ISSN: 13071629.

Zikmund, W.G. 1997. Business Research Methods, Fifth Edition, New York (US). The Dryden Press, USA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jam23026332.14.2.01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.