Didik Nurcahyanto, Rofiaty Rofiaty, Mintarti Rahayu


This study examines the effect of paternalistic leadership on Gen-Y employees’ turnover intentions, mediated by motivation and satisfaction. The research used 186 samples of Gen-Y employees from BCA Regional Office, Malang as respondents. Research data were obtained through questionnaires and analyzed through SmartPLS. The results indicate that paternalistic leadership affects Gen-Yemployees’ turnover intentions through satisfaction.Mediation effect of motivation is not found in the influence of paternalistic leadership on turnover intention.The implementation of paternalistic leadership cannot keep turnover rate low, but only to help.


paternalistic leadership; motivation; satisfaction; turnover intention

Full Text:



Abbasi, S. M., and K. W. Hollman. 2000. Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management 29 (3):333-342.

Belias, D., and A. Koustelios. 2014. Transformational leadership and job satisfaction in the Banking Sector: A review. International Review of Management and Marketing 4 (3):187-200.

Belias, D., A. Koustelios, L. Sdrolias, and G. Aspridis. 2015a. Job satisfaction, role conflict, and autonomy of employees in the Greek banking organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 175:324333.

Belias, D., A. Koustelios, L. Sdrollias, and M. Koutiva. 2013. The influence of demographic features on the job satisfaction of Greek bank employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research 3 (4):15-28.

Belias, D., A. Koustelios, G. Vairaktarakis, and L. Sdrolias. 2015b. Organizational culture and job satisfaction of Greek banking institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 175:314-323.

Çetin, M., M. E. Karabay, and M. N. Efe. 2012. The effects of leadership styles and the communication competency of bank managers on the employee’s job satisfaction: The case of Turkish Banks. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 58:227-235.

Chatzopoulou, M., A. Vlachvei, and T. Monovasilis. 2015. Employee’s motivation and satisfaction in light of economic recession: Evidence of Grevena Prefecture-Greece. Procedia Economics and Finance 24:136-145.

Cheng, B.-S. 2008. Paternalistic leadership in the Chinese contexts: A full-cycle indigenous approach. Paper read at XXIX International Congress of Psychology. Berlin.

Chou, W.-J., C. G. Sibley, J. H. Liu, T.-T. Lin, and B.-S. Cheng. 2015. Paternalistic leadership profiles A person-centered approach. Group and Organization Management 40 (5):685-710.

Farh, J.-L., and B.-S. Cheng. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, edited by J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui and E. Weldon. Great Britain: Macmilan Press, 84-127.

Howe, N., and W. Strauss. 2000. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York, NY: Vintage.

Ibeogu, P. H., and A. Ozturen. 2015. Perception of justice in performance appraisal and effect on satisfaction: Empirical findings from Northern Cyprus Banks. Procedia Economics and Finance 23:964-969.

Irawanto, D. W., P. L. Ramsey, and D. C. Tweed. 2012. Exploring paternalistic leadership and its application to the Indonesian public sector. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services 8 (1):4-20.

Ito, J. K., and C. M. Brotheridge. 2005. Does supporting employees’ career adaptability lead to commitment, turnover, or both?. Human Resource Management 44 (1):5-19.

Lindner, J. R. 1998. Understanding employee motivation. Journal of Extension 36 (3):1-8.

Locke, E. A. 1976. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1297-1343.

Mathieu, C., and P. Babiak. 2015. Tell me who you are, I’ll tell you how you lead: Beyond the Full-Range Leadership Model, the role of corporate psychopathy on employee attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences 87:8-12.

———. 2016. Corporate psychopathy and abusive supervision: Their influence on employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Personality and Individual Differences 91:102-106.

Michaels, C. E., and P. E. Spector. 1982. Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (1):53-59.

Mobley, W. H. 1977. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:237240.

Ng, E. S. W., L. Schweitzer, and S. T. Lyons. 2010. New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology 25 (2):281-292.

Salami, S. O., and S. O. Ajitoni. 2015. Job characteristics and burnout: The moderating roles of emotional intelligence, motivation, and pay among bank employees. International Journal of Psychology 51 (5):375-382.

Sdrolias, L., D. Belias, A. Koustelios, A. Gkolia, M. Koutiva, A. Thomos, and K. Varsanis. 2014. Job satisfaction and motivation in the Greek banking sector. Paper read at 9th Annual MIBES International Conference, Perrotis College, Thessaloniki 30th May 1st June.

Shaw, J. D., J. E. Delery, G. D. Jenkins, and N. Gupta. 1998. An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal 41 (5):511-525.

Shrivastava, A., and P. Purang. 2011. Employee perceptions of performance appraisals: A comparative study on Indian banks. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (3):632-647.

Steel, R. P., and N. K. Ovalle. 1984. A review and metaanalysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (4):673-686.

Tumen, S., and T. Zeydanli. 2016. Social interactions in job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower 37 (3):426-455



  • There are currently no refbacks.