Liestya Padmawidjaja, Timotius F. C. W. Sutrisno, Nisa Setiani


This study was used to determine the acceptance preferences of OVO technology in business faculty students in Surabaya using the TAM theory model (Technology Acceptance Model) that focuses on Perceived Efficacy Factors, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usage that is Easy to Use, and Perceptions of Use that are Perceived and Behavior Intentions for Use. OVO service is a mobile application that allows users to transact using electronic money. There is a trend of using electronic money payments using transitions to make transactions easier, more effective, and efficient, but still safe. Survey data were collected from 160 OVO users and analyzed using quantitative methods with multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Perceived Risks and TAM core constructs such as Perceived Usability and Perceived Ease of Use have been proven to be both partially and simultaneously significant for the Behavior of Intention to Use. This study explains the significant relationship between constructs and discussing this information can be used to increase OVO acceptance among Surabaya students. This research is based on primary data collection and interpretation. This provides comprehensive insights about OVO acceptance to students in the city of Surabaya.


Technology Acceptance Model; Perceived Usefulness; Perceived Ease of Use; Perceived Risk; Behavioral Intention to Use; OVO

Full Text:



APJII. 2019. Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tahun 2018. In Apjii.www.

Bank Indonesia. 2019. Jumlah Uang Elektronik Beredar (Nomor 11). sistem-pembayaran/uang-elektronik/Contents/ Jumlah Uang Elektronik.aspx.

Berita Satu. 2018. OVO Tingkatkan Penetrasi di Universitas. Berita Satu.

Chauhan, S. 2015. Acceptance of mobile money by poor citizens of India: Integrating trust into the technology acceptance model. Info, 17(3), 58–68. https:/ /

Chuttur, M. 2009. Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1–23.

Dalcher, I. and Shine, J. 2003. Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A Bank’s Treasury. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(4), 441–455.

Giovanis, A., Athanasopoulou, P., Assimakopoulos, C., and Sarmaniotis, C. 2019. Adoption of mobile banking services: A comparative analysis of four competing theoretical models. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(5), 1165–1189. 10.1108/IJBM-08-2018-0200.

Hastomo, A. D. and Aras, M. 2018. Influence of Cashless Society Socialization toward Trust Transaction Culture in Jakarta, Indonesia. Humaniora, 9(1), 1– 13.

Juhri, K. and Dewi, C. K. 2017. Kepercayaan Dan Penerimaan Layanan Mobile Money T-Cash Di Bandung Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model ( Tam ). Jurnal Pro Bisnis, 10(1), 36–51.

Kata Data. 2019. OVO Jadi Dompet Digital Terbesar di Indonesia Berkat Ekosistem Grab. In Kata Data.

Kompas. 2019. Penggunaan Uang Elektronik Melonjak 77,6 Persen. kompas. read/2019/04/25/171509826/penggunaan-uangelektronik-melonjak-776-persen.

Kontan. 2020. Sepanjang 2019 OVO catat 1 miliar transaksi., 1–5. https://keuangan.

Manik, T. 2019. Analisis Pengaruh Transaksi Digitalisasi Uang Elektronik terhadap Cashless Society dan Infrastruktur Uang Elektronik sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Finansial Indonesia, 2(2), 27–40.

Pratama, A. B. and Suputra, I. D. G. D. 2019. Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, dan Tingkat Kepercayaan Pada Minat Menggunakan Uang Elektronik. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(2), 927–953. eja.2019.v27.i02.p04.

Setiawan, A. and Sulistiowati, L. H. 2017. Penerapan Modifikasi Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam E-Business. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 10(2), 171–186. jmpj.v10i2.2277.

Surendran, P. 2012. Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 2(3), 175–178.

Syahril, W. N. and Rikumahu, B. 2019. Penggunaan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam Analisis Minat Perilaku Penggunaan E-Money pada Mahasiswa Universitas Telkom. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen ( JMM Online ), 3(2), 201–214.

Teofilus, Sanju Kumar Singh, Timotius FCW Sutrisno, and Anthony Kurniawan. 2020. Analyzing Entrepreneurial Marketing On Innovative Performance. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(1), 78–90. https://

Tileng, K. G. 2015. Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model pada Aplikasi Edmodo di Universitas Ciputra Surabaya menggunakan Analisis Jalur. Jurnal Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, 01(01), 28– 37. view/26.

Tobbin, P. and Kuwornu, J. K. M. 2011. Adoption of Mobile Money Transfer Technology: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. In European Journal of Business and Management ISSN (Vol. 3, Nomor 7). Online.

Wiradinata, T. 2018. Mobile Payment Services Adoption: The Role of Perceived Technology Risk.

Yani, E., Lestari, A. F., Amalia, H., and Puspita, A. 2018. Pengaruh Internet Banking Terhadap Minat Nasabah Dalam Bertransaksi Dengan Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Informatika, 5(1), 34–42.



  • There are currently no refbacks.