PHENOMENA BEHAVIOR FRAUD IN GOVERNMENT

Mardatillah Mardatillah, Jusuf Irianto, Antun Mariyanta

Abstract


This research is based on government civil state apparatus as the government’s front guard that reflects the healthy and strong government but the facts showed that there are cases of government doing fraudulent behavior from mild to severe. Also, it aims to reveal the phenomenon of fraud behavior of the civil apparatus. This is the preliminary research obtained from interviews and observation in the field by actively participating in every government activity. The result of the research shows that the mild cheating fraud behavior in each unit of the regional apparatus is handled by the superior of the agency and they only make a report of doing coaching to the employment agency and the human resource development. For the medium and heavy fraud behavior, the coaching is done by the employment agency and human resource development together with the inspectorate agency by making a coaching team. Coaching is done based on complaints from the number of Regional Work Unit (SKPD), community complaints, and monthly attendance monitoring. The phenomenon of fraud behavior in the government environment. Furthermore, the results of this study can act also as consideration matters to change the system, procedures, and policies to prevent fraud behavior and suppress the culture. For further researchers to make a comparison of methods and mix methods also find the factors that cause and prevent potential violations

Keywords


phenomena; fraud behavior; government

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Creswell, John. 2015. Qualitative Reseach and Design Research. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Denzin, Norman, K. and Lincoln, Yvonna, S.2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 2, edisi ketiga. San Fransisco.

Fathi, W. N. I. W. M., Ghani, E. K., Said, J., and Puspitasari, E. 2017. Potential employee fraud scape in Islamic banks: The fraud triangle perspective. Global Journal Al-ThaqafahVolume 7, Issue 2, 79-93.

Harrison, A. 2014. The Effect of Techonology on Interpersonal Fraud. A dissertasi submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor of Philosophy. Iowa Stare University. Ames, Iowa, USA

Merriam, Sharan, B. 2009.Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. San Fransisco,USA

Olsen, Asmus Leth, Frederik Hjorth, Nikolaj Harmon, and Sebastian Barfort. 2019. Behavioral Dishonesty in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research And Theory, Article Advance Access publication October 8, 2018, 572–590

Ramamoorti, Sridhar. 2008. The Psychology and Sociology of Fraud: Integrating the Behavioral Sciences Component Into Fraud and Forensic Accounting Curricula. Accounting Education; Sarasota Vol. 23, Iss. 4: 521-533.

Said, Jamaliah, Md. Mahmudul Alam, Zulyanti Abdul Karim, and Razana Juhaida Johari. 2018. Integrating Religiosity Into Fraud Triangle Theory: Findings on Malaysia Police Officers. Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice, Vol. 4 Issue: 2, pp.111-123, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09- 2017-0027

Wright, Judy D. 2015. An Examination of the Effects of Moral Maturity, Propensity for Moral Disengagement, Entitlement Perceptions, and Anomia on Fraud Behavior. Dissertations in Business Psychology. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. Illinois.

Yoong, Tan Lee Chee, Nor Rahayu Ngatirin, and Zurinahni Zainol. 2017. Personality Prediction Based on Social Media Using Decision Tree Algorithm Pertanika J. Sci. & Technol. 25 (S): 237 - 248




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.02.10

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.