CONSUMER BEHAVIOR OF INTEREST AND USE OF CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY AS SUPPORT TO BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

Fitri Purnamasari, Imam Subekti, Aulia Fuad Rahman

Abstract


The objective of this study is to assess the various factors that determine consumer behavioral intention and actual use of cloud computing as a technology considered capable of supporting business activities. The population of this research is the collegestudents in Malang. The data was collected through survey method. 153 questionnaires were distributed directly to the respondent or via an internet link. The study shows that there are several factors determining the behavior of individual’s intention and actual usage of cloud computing technology, that is the compatibility and the ease of use on cloud computing. Both factors proved to have partial mediation effect on the actual usage of cloud computing through the behavioral intention of using cloud computing.Other findings are positive effects of the usefulness of cloud computing on behavioral intention on using cloud computing, and the cloud computing user’s image on the actual usage of cloud computing. Businessmay consider cloud computing technology as well as those factors to be applied to gaining more consumers and can be used as a breakthrough to add new competitive advantage.

Keywords


Consumers Behavior; Behavioral Intention; Actual Usage of Technology; Cloud Computing Technology; University Students in Malang

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.

Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-221.

Ajzen, I., and Fisbein, M. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley. Reading, MA.

Alhammadi, A., Stanier, C., and Eardley, A. 2015. The Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption in Saudi Arabia. Computer Science and Information Technology, 55.

Alkhater, N., Wills, G., and Walters, R. 2014. Factors Influencing an Organisation’s Intention to Adopt Cloud Computing in Saudi Arabia. IEEE.

Asniar, and Sari. 2015. Pemanfaatan Cloud Computing untuk Enterprise Resources Planning di Indonesia. Infotel, 7(1).

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1173-1182.

Chou, D. C. 2015. Cloud computing: A value creation model. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 38, 72- 77.

Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 319.

Dillon, T., Wu, C., and Chang, E. 2010. Cloud Computing: Issues and Challenges. In: Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). IEEE.

Firmansyah, A., and Noorlalily. 2006. Penggunaan internet dalam menunjang proses pembelajaran Mahasiswa di Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengapdian Masyarakat Unair.

Gartner. 2009. Cloud Computing Inquiries at Gartner. Retrieved 9 16, 2015, from http://blogs.gartner.com/ thomas_bittman/2009/10/29/cloud-computing-inquiries- at-gartner

Gregg, D. G., and Walczak, S. 2008. Dressing Your Online Auction Business for Success: An Experiment Comparing Two eBay Businesses. MIS Quarterly, 32, 653.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis (7 ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Hartono, I., and Abdillah, W. 2009. Konsep dan Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk Penelitian Empiris. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Hutchinson, C., Ward, J., and Castilon, K. 2009. Navigating the next-generation application architecture. IT professional, 2, 18-22.

Jeffery, and Neidecker-Lutz. 2010. The Future of Cloud Computing: Opportunities for European Cloud Computing Beyond 2010: expert Group Report. European Commission: Information Society and Media.

Jogiyanto. 2014. Pedoman Survei Kuesioner: Mengembangkan Kuesioner, Mengatasi Bias dan Meningkatkan Respon (2 ed.). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UGM.

Kementerian Riset Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi. 2016. ristekdikti.go.id. Retrieved 8 23, 2016, from http://ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ klasifikasi20151.pdf

Larsen, T. J. 2005. Impact of Personal Innovativeness on The Use of Internet Among Employees at Work. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 17(2), 43-63.

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., and Kai, R. R. 2003. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 12.

Lin, A., and Chen, N. C. 2012. Cloud computing as An Innovation: Percepetion, Attitude, and Adoption. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 533-540.

Low, C., Chen, Y., and Wu, M. 2011. Understanding The Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(7), 1006- 1023.

Lymperopoulos, C., and Chaniotakis, I. E. 2005. Factors affecting acceptance of the Internet as a marketingintelligence tool among employees of Greek bank branches. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(6), 484-505.

Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., and Ghalsasi, A. 2011. Cloud Computing - The Business Perspective. HICSS.

Masrun. 1979. Reliabilitas dan Cara-cara Menentukannya. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Monroy, C. R., Arias, C. A., and Guerrero, Y. N. 2013. The New Cloud Computing Paradigm: The Way to IT Seen As A Utility. Latin American and Caribbean Journalof Engineering Education.

Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. 1991. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 192-222.

Moorthy, M. K., Voon, O. O., Samsuri, C. A., Gopalan, M., and Yew, K. T. 2012. Application of information technology in management accounting decision making. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(3), 1-16.

Nkhoma, M. Z., and Dang, D. P. 2013. Contributing factors of cloud computing adoption: a technologyorganisation- environment framework approach. European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation.

Novianto, I. 2013. Perilaku penggunaan internet di kalangan mahasiswa (studi deskriptif tentang perilaku penggunaan internet dikalangan mahasiswa perguruan tinggi negeri (fisip unair) dengan perguruan tinggi swasta (fisip upn) untuk memenuhi kebutuhan informasinya). Journal Universitas Airlangga, 2(1).

Parveen, F., and Sulaiman, A. 2008. Technology complexity, personal innovativeness and intention to use wireless internet using mobile devices in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 1-10.

Pyke, J. 2009. Cordys-Now is the time to take the cloud seriously. Retrieved 11 9, 2015, from http:// www.cordys.com/cordyscms_sites/objects/ bb1 a 0 bd 7 f4 7 b1 c 9 1d d f3 6 ba 7 d b88 2 4 1 d / time_to_take_the_cloud_seroiusly_online_1_.pdf

Rahma, S. 2016. MalangVoice. Retrieved 8 24, 2016, from http://malangvoice.com/iccc-tasbihkan-malangsebagai- kota-pendidikan-internasional/

Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation, 25-38.

Rosen, P. A. 2005. The Effect of Personal Innovativeness on Technology Acceptance and Use. Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University, Doctoral Dissertation.

Rouibah, K., and Abbas, H. 2010. Effect of Personal Innovativeness, Attachment Motivation and Social Norms on the Acceptance of Camera Mobile Phones. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research, 1(4), 41-62.

Sabi, H. M., Uzoka, F. M., Langmia, K., and Njeh, F. N. 2016. Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 183-191.

Schubert, L., Jeffery, K., and Neidecker-Lutz, B. 2010. The Future of Cloud Computing. Information Society and Media.

Sekaran, U. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Setyawan, M. B. 2015. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Cloud Computing di Rumah Sakit Muhammadiyah. Simetris, 6(2), 197-204.

Sholihin , M., and Ratmono, D. 2013. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Stieninger, M., and Nedbal, D. 2014. Diffusion and Acceptance of Cloud Computing. Hawaii: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Stieninger, M., Nedbal, D., Wetzlinger, W., Wagner, G., and Erskine, M. A. 2014. Impacts on the organizational adoption of cloud computing: A reconceptualization of influencing factors. Procedia Technology, 16, 85-93.

Strauss, E., Kristandl, G., and Quinn, M. 2015. The effects of cloud technology on management accounting and decision-making. Management and Financial Accounting Report, 10(6).

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R and D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thakur, R., and Srivastava, M. 2014. Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Research, 24(3), 369- 392.

Tornatzky, L. G., and Fleischer, M. 1990. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

Wei, G., Xinyan, Z., and Yue, M. 2011. Literature review on consumer adoption behavior of mobile commerce services. Proceedings for E-business and e-government (ICEE).

Wibowo, A. 2008. Kajian tentang perilaku pengguna sistem informasi dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (TAM). Jakarta: Fakultas Teknologi Informasi Universitas Budi Luhur.

Windarta, I. W. 2011. Determinan minat keperilakuan untuk menggunakan sistem informasi akuntansi berbasis teknologi informasi. Malang: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.

Yu, P., Haocheng, L., and Marie-Pierre, G. 2009. Health IT Acceptance Factors In Long-Term Care Facilities A Cross-Sectional Survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 219-229.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.01.05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.