THE INFLUENCE OF GROUP DYNAMICS TO STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY IN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CLASS OF UNIVERSITAS CIPUTRA

Liliana Dewi

Abstract


The education world has significant roles in encouraging students to be productive, collaborative, and communicative in this competitive era. Therefore, educators should be able to administer classes where students can experience learning process to have the necessary skills in working environment. One way to establish the desired learning process is by designing and setting special learning groups in the classroom as an environment to develop students’ social skills and their productivity. The desired environment is an environment which nurtures students’ creativity in developing their social skills and productivity, namely group dynamics. To achieve this goal, a qualitative research is conducted in marketing management classes in Ciputra University Surabaya, Indonesia, to see if setting a dynamics environment are able to grow students’ creativity. In several similar cases, educators believe in the need of organizing learning groups which fit the development of twenty first century. Dynamics environment is needed to grow students’ creativity. The research will contribute some knowledge on how higher education educators organize and set learning groups in big class. The results of the research will suggest some ways to organize and set the learning groups which are effective in developing students’ creativity.

Keywords


Creativity; Group Dynamics; Marketing Management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldrich, H. (2000). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Baron, R.A., & Tang, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing 26, pp. 49-60.

Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A. (2008). A metaanalysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin 134, pp. 779-806.

Beehr, T.A., Jex, S.M., Stacy, B.A., Murray, M.A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, pp. 391-405.

Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 29, pp. 52-73.

Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of inquiry. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.). Handbook of classroom management (pp. 3–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group Dynamics (5 th ed). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning

Jaafar, F. M. D., Hashim, R. A., & Ariffin, T. F. T. (2012). Malaysian university student learning involvement scale (MUSLIS): Validation of a student engagement model. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 9, 15-30.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing management (14 th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expended source-book (2 nd ed). Sage, Thousand Oaks: CA.

Miller, K.D. (2007). Risk and rationality in entrepreneurial processes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, pp. 57-74.

Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory: The effects of group composition on the individual. In B. Mullen & G.R. Goethals (Eds), Theories of group behavior (pp. 125-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Murphy, M. (2006). Sick building syndrome and the problem of uncertainty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In Baum, J. R., Frese, M. & Baron, R. (Eds.). The Psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 4165). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper and Row.

Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological from of the group. American Journal of Sociology, 8, pp. 1-46, 158-196.

Stranks, J. (2005). Stress at work. Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann, Burlington, MA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2019.017.04.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.