ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE APPROACHMENT FOR DESIGNING IT MASTER PLAN BASED ON ERP FOR WATER UTILITY COMPANY

Hilmi Azmi Fatimah, Irman Hermadi, Yani Nurhadryani

Abstract


A comprehensive planning document that is written in the IT Master Plan has the purpose of addressing the company’s need and guiding the implementation process to minimize failure. But many IT master plan was not based on integrated and best practice adoption using ERP. The development of the IT master plan also does not use the proper enterprise architecture (EA) method. This research designed an IT master plan based on ERP using Enterprise Architecture approachment for water utility companies and adopt ERP best practice references model. The Enterprise Architecture’s method was TOGAF ADM from a prelim phase, requirement management phase, vision architecture phase, business architecture phase, and information system architecture phase. This research gave the results of 23 system recommendations named IT Integrated Solution for water utility companies which consist of 10 integrated applications, 8 ERP modules, and 5 ERP Industry Solution-Utility (IS-U) modules. To get a comprehensive IT Master Plan based on ERP, the water company needs to pay attention to other stages of TOGAF ADM. There needs to be a study to be able to validate the IT Master Plan, which has been developed.

Keywords


Enterprise Architecture; ERP; Master Plan TI; Water Utility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carbo, M. 2016. SAP for water: an overview of credentials and portfolio [On Line]. https://blogs.sap.com/ Bill 2016/09/08/sap-for-water-overview-of-credentialsand-portfolio/ [Mei 22, 2018].

Chofreh, A.G., Goni, F.A., Ismail, S., Shaharoun, A.M., Klemeš, J.J., Zeinalnezhad, M. 2016. A master plan for the implementation of sustainable enterprise resource planning systems (part I): Concept and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production. 13(B):176-182.

Chofreh, A.G., Goni, F.A., Ismail, S., Shaharoun, A.M., Klemeš, J.J., Zeinalnezhad, M. 2017. A roadmap for sustainable enterprise resource planning systems implementation (part III). Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.285.

Chofreh, A.G., Goni, F.A., Goni, F.A., Klemeš, J.J. 2018. Development a framework for sustainable enterprise resource planning systems implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/ j.jclepro.2018.04.182.

Clark T, Barn BS, Oussena S. 2012. A method for enterprise architecture alignment. In: Proper E., Gaaloul K., Harmsen F., Wrycza S. (eds) Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 120. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31134-5_3.

Desfray, P., Raymond, G. 2014. Modeling Enterprise Architecture with TOGAF. Burlington(USA): Morgan Kaufmann.

Djufri, I. 2017. Strategic review IT master plan (case study institute of primagama education). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology. 6(7): 1047-1054.

Ebsworth, J. 2007. SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework [On Line]. https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/ Uploads/Files/SAP—UK-.pdf [September 19, 2018].

Edward, I.Y.M., Shalannanda, W., Lestariningati, S.I., Agusdian, A. 2014. E-government master plan design with TOGAF framework. 8th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA). doi: 10.1109/ TSSA.2014.7065957.

Finlay, A., Adera, E. 2012. Application of ICTS for Climate Change Adoption In The Water Sector: Developing country experiences and emerging research priorities. International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

Karsak, EE., Özogul, CO. 2009. An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection. Expert Systems with Applications. 36(1):660–667.

Kazemi, A., Saeidi, S.R., Azizmohammadi, M. 2014. Selecting an ERP system using multi-criteria decision making method: A goal programming and fuzzy approach. International Journal Business Information Systems. 16(1):55-71.

Kirby, S. 2009. SAP EAF and TOGAF 9: history, differences, similarities, and recommendations for the future. The Open Group Conference London [On Line] http://archive.opengroup.org/public/member/ pr oceedi n g s / q209/ q209a / Pr es e n t a t i on s / pl_kirby.pdf [July 20, 2018].

Magal, S., Word, J. 2012. Integrated business processes with ERP systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Park, J., Park, J. 2015. Enterprise resource planning and efficiency: Evidence from the Korean Property/ Casualty insurance companies. Managerial Finance. 41(4): 405–415.

Rouhani, B.D., Mahrin, M.N., Nikpay, F., Nikfard, P. 2013. A comparison enterprise architecture implementation methodologies. 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia, pp. 16.

Rupèiæ, N., Ivešiæ, Sandra. 2018. Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning in small enterprises: A case study. Managing change to achieve quality development, Naèinoviæ Braje, Ivana; Jakoviæ, Božidar; Paviæ, Ivana (Eds.), University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, pp.489-496 (ISBN: 978-953-346-056-7).

Sasa, A., Kisper, M. 2011. Enterprise architecture patterns for business process support analysis. Journal of Systems and Software. 84(9): 1480-1506.

Silva, M. G. 2015. Towards the Digital Utility with SAP for Utilities and S/4 Hana for Utilities. [On Line] http://sap.lianacms.com/media/events/library/assets/enr-forum/1.towards-digital-utility_vfinal.pdf. [October 10, 2018].

Subowo, M.H. 2015. Perancangan Infrastruktur Teknol ogi Inf ormasi Adapti f Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja TOGAF dan SONA: Studi Kasus PT. XYZ [tesis]. Jakarta (ID): Universitas Indonesia.

Sultanow, E., Brockmann, C., Schroeder, K., Cox, S. 2016. A multidimensional classification of 55 enterprise architecture frameworks. AMCIS.

The Open Group. 2011. An overview of TOGAF version 9.1. [On Line] http://www.opengroup.org/public/member/proceedings/q312/togaf_intro_weisman.pdf [October, 23 2018].

Trinskjaer, J.K. 2009. Combining Enterprise Architecture and ERP Systems [thesis]. The IT University of Copenhagen.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2019.017.02.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.