DRY PORT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
Abstract
Export and import activities are the most important part of economic activity in Indonesia. These need to be supported by good port infrastructure. Cikarang Dry Port (CDP) as the only Dry Port, owned by private, should be able to support export and import activities and supply chains, especially in the Greater Jakarta and Cikarang areas. There is a need to develop appropriate business development strategies to maximize resources and optimize opportunities from the CDP business environment. These study aims were identifying the influence of internal and external factors that affect the development of the CDP business and formulating business development strategies. The method used in this study is descriptive analysis and purposive sampling. Analytical tools used include internal and external analysis and SWOT. The main strength is the availability of land port capacity. An external factor that provides relative significance to the successful development of Dry Port is the usage of internet and application on a smartphone. The regulation for expansion and New Priok business development by JICT which is the biggest threat scored. Future research is expected to analyze the efficiency of time, performance and human resources in Cikarang Dry Port.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chang, Z., Yang D., Wan Y., and Han T. 2018. Analysis on the features of Chinese Dry Ports: Transport Policy. Doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.06.008
Chengpeng, W. Di Z., Xinping Y., and Zaili Y. 2018. A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development: A case study of major ports in China. Transportation Research Part D. 61: 431443.
Cikarang Dry Port. About Us. [on line] cikarangdryport. com [August 15, 2017]
David, F. R. 2009. Manajemen strategis. Sunardi D, penerjemah; Wuriarti P, editor. Penertbit Salemba Empat. Terjemahan dari: Strategic Management Concepts andCases. Ed ke 12
Derbie, J. and Raimbault N. 2016. The port city relationshi p i n two European i nl and port s: A geographichal perspective on urban governance. Cities. 50: 180-187.
Handayani, M. and Dedi M. 2017. Pengaruh promosi wisata bahari dan kualitas pelayanan terhadap peningkatan jumlah kunjungan wisatawan di Pelabuhan Muncar Banyuwangi. Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikrosil. 7(2): 151-160.
Haralambides, H. and Girish G. 2011. The Indian Dry Ports sector pricing policies and opportunities for public-private partnership. Research in Transportation Economics. 33: 51-58
Ihsani, A. 2018. Strategi peningkatan adopsi teknologi pencarian dan pemindahan aplikasi halal MUI di Kota Bogor. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Jeevan, J., Chen S., and Lee E. 2015. The challenges of malaysian Dry Port development. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistic. 31 (1): 109-134.
Lattila, L., Henttu V., and Hilmola OP. 2013. Hinterland operations of seaports do matter: Dry Port usage effect on transportation cost and CO emission. Transportation Research Part E. 55: 23-42.
Mardaeka. 2014. Pengaruh strategi promosi perdagangan (trade promotion) terhadap penjualan snack kentang Piattos di wilayah Jabodetabek. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Muljana, M. 2014. Pengaruh promosi penjualan pupuk hayati rhizoplex PT. Borneo Patra Agro. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Nainggolan, B. P. A. M. 2017. Faktor-faktor determinan/ penentu penguasaan pangsa muatan angkutan laut barang ekspor oleh kapal kontainer berbendera Indonesia di Pelabuhan Belawan. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Nguyen, L. C. and Notteboom T. 2016. A multicriteria approach to Dry Port location in developing economics with application in Vietnam. The Asian Journal Shipping and Logistic. 32 (1): 23-32.
Parraga, M. M., Cancelas N. G., and Flores F. S. 2014. DELPHI-SWOT tools used in strategic planning of the Port of Manta. Procedia. 162: 129-138.
Rahajeng, K. H. 2016. Cikarang Dry Port dukung penurunan dwel l i ng ti me. [On Line]. http:// www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/391309-cikarang-dryport-dukung-penurunan-dwelling-time.html [September 30, 2018]
Rangkuti, F. 2014. Analisis swot teknik membedah kasus bisnis. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Roso, V., Woxenius J., and Lumsden K. 2009. The Dry Port concept: Connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography. 17: 338-343.
Ruswandi, A. and Gartika D. 2013. Strategi pengembangan investasi di sekitar pelabuhan perikanan tipe B di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Akuatika. 4 (1): 89-101.
Segui, X., Puig M., Quintieri E., Wooldrige E., and Darbra R. M. 2016. New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector. Environmental Science and Policy. 58: 29-40.
Sipayung, M. N. P. 2017. Pengaruh bauran pemasaran terhadap ekuitas merek sampo eskulin kids. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Siregar, I. C. 2018. Strategi komoditas tomat Ovop untuk menembus pasar ekspor. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Soemantadiredja, A. 2017. Analisis adopsi inovasi aplikasi GO-JEK. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Suyono, R. P. 2001. Shipping: pengangkutan intermodal ekspor impor melalui laut. Jakarta : Penerbit PPM.
Syahbanu, D. 2014. Analisis penanganan kargo eskpor komodi t as hort ikul t ura di Termi nal Kargo Bandara Soekarno Hatta: Studi kasus PT. Jasa Angkasa Semesta Tbk. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Tan, Z., Li W., Zhang X., and Yang H. 2015. Service charge and capacity selection of an inland riverpoint with location dependent shipping cost and service congestion. Transportation Research Part E. 76: 13-33.
Ulfany, A. F., Wicaksono A., and Anwar M. R. 2017. Kajian kinerja pelayaran general cargo Terminal Jamrud di Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya. Rekayasa Sipil. 11 (3): 245 252.
Wahyuningsih, S. 2012. Analisis SWOT untuk penentuan strategi optimalisasi infrastruktur. Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi. 10 (4): 289-304.
Wang, G. W. Y., Zeng Q., Li K., and Yang J. 2016. Port connectivity in logistic network: The case of Bohai bay Chinna. Transportation Research Part E. 95: 341-354
Wang, K. and Hong W. C. 2011. Competitive advantage analysis and strategic formulation of airport city development: The case of Taiwan. Transport Policy. 18: 276-288.
Witte, P., Wiegmans B., Braun C., and Spit T. 2016. Weakest link or strongest, node? Comparing governance strategies for inland ports in Trans National European corridors. Research in Transportation Business and Management. 19: 97-105.
Zhan, Q., Geerlings H., Makhlaufi A. E., and Chen S. 2018. Who governs and what is governd in port governance: A review study. Transport Policy. 64: 51-60.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.04.01
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.