MORATORIUM ON OIL PALM: ECOLOGICAL RECOVERY OR ECONOMIC SLOWDOWN?

Syti Sarah Maesaroh, Arif Imam Suroso, Iyung Pahan

Abstract


The aims of this study are to determine the factors that affect the moratorium policy and its effect on the national production of palm oil. This study used an in-depth interviewwithpairwise comparison questionnaire to experts. Data were analyzed using Analytical Network Process (ANP),consisting of three stages (model construction, model quantification, and analysis). The results showed that law enforcement, sustainability, conflict resolution, deforestation and land conversion were factors that influence the success of the moratorium. The various problems in these factors indicate that the moratorium cannot be done optimally. During sixyears of its implementation, the moratorium impactson the sustainability of palm oil production in Indonesia.Evaluation of moratorium is needed by using quantitative data. Forest deforestation due to oil palm plantation can be used to support the policy analysis.

Keywords


Conflict resolution; deforestation; law enforcement; sustainability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afonso, O., S. Monteiro., And M. Thompson. 2012. A Growth Model for the Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory. Journal of Business Economic and Management, Volume 13, Number 4, Pages 1-31. Lithuania: Taylor & Francis Online.

Daemeter Consulting. 2015. Perkembangan Kerangka Tata Kelola Kelapa Sawit di Indonesia: Implikasi untuk Sektor Kelapa Sawit yang Bebas Dari Deforestasi dan Bebas Dari Gambut. [On line]. From: http:// daemeter.org/id/publication/detail/44/Indonesias- Evolving-Governance-Framework-for-Palm-Oil-Implications- for-a-No-Deforestation-No-Peat-Palm- Oil-Sector#.WZ8LzrYxXIU [Jun 30, 2017].

Ditjendbun. 2016. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2015- 2017 Kelapa Sawit. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Ditjendbun. 2017. Rencana Aksi Nasional Kelapa Sawit Berkelanjutan 2018-2023. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Elkington, J. and J. Zeitz. 2014. Break Through Challenge 10 Ways to Connect Today’s Profits with Tomorrow’s Bottom Line. First Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Forest Watch Indonesia. 2017. Enam Tahun ISPO. [On line]. From: http://fwi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/03/6_tahun_ISPO.pdf [25 Jul, 2017]. Forest Watch Indonesia. 2017. Enam Tahun Memperbaiki Tata Kelola Hutan dan Lahan Gambut Sebuah Evaluasi atas Pelaksanaan Instruksi Presiden Tentang Penundaan Pemberian Izin Baru dan Penyempurnaan Tata Kelola Hutan Alam Primer dan Lahan Gambut. [On line]. From: http://fwi.or.id/ publikasi/enam-tahun-memperbaiki-tata-kelolahutan- dan-lahan-gambut-sebuah-valuasi-ataspelaksanaan- instruksi-presiden-tentang-penundaan- pemberian-izin-baru-dan- enyempurnaan-tatakelola- hutan-alam-primer-dan/ [16 Mei, 2017].

Gabungan Pengusaha Kelapa Sawit Indonesia(GAPKI). 2013. Indonesia dan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit dalam Isu Lingkungan Global. Jakarta: GAPKI.

Handayani, I.G.A.K.R. 2009. Penegakan Hukum Kehutanan dalam Rangka Antisipasi Dampak Climate Change di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum. Volume 21, Nomor 2, Halaman 372-379. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada.

Handayani, I.G.A.K.R. 2012. Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Penegakan Hukum Kehutanan di Indonesia. Jurnal EKOSAINS. Volume IV, Nomor 2, Halaman 7-12.Ambon: Universitas Pattimura.

Joyosemito, I.S., T. Akihiro., And N. Toyohiko. 2014. System Dynamics Model Development for Evaluation of the Moratorium Policy on New Forest and Peatland Concessions under Bilateral Cooperation in Indonesia: Palm oil Industry Sector Case Study. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment. Volume 5, Number 1, Pages 1-12. Bangkok: Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment.

Kariyasa, I.K. 2015. Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Penggunaan Bibit Bersertifikat Kelapa Sawit di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat.Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. Volume 33, Nomor 2, Halaman 141-159. Bogor: Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian Kementerian Pertanian.

Lembaga Riset Perkebunan. 2015. Membandingkan Industri CPO Malaysia dengan Indonesia. Bogor: Lembaga Riset Perkebunan Indonesia.

Murdiyarso, D., S. Dewi., D. Lawrence., And F. Seymor. 2011. Indonesia’s Forest Moratorium. [On line]. From: https://www.cifor.org/library/3561/ indonesias-forest-moratorium-a-stepping-stone-tobetter- forest-governance/ [Dec 16, 2016].

Pahan, I. 2017. Panduan Lengkap Kelapa Sawit Manajemen Agribisnis dari Hulu hingga Hilir. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Runtukahu, E. 2014. Hambatan dan Upaya Pembenahan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan di Bidang Kehutanan. Lex et Societatis. Volume II, Nomor 2, Halaman 62-70. Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Suroso, A.I. 2008. Analisis Daya Saing dan Dampak Ekonomi Regional Pengembangan Kelapa Sawit di Kabupaten Siak. Disertasi di Institut Pertanian Bogor: Bogor.

Susila, R. W. 2004. The contribution of Plam Oil Industry to Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. Volume 23, Number 3, Pages 107-114. Bogor: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

World Growth. 2011. Manfaat Minyak Sawit bagi Perekonomian Indonesia. [On line]. From: http:// worldgrowth.org/site/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/ WG_Indonesian_Palm_Oil_Benefits_Bahasa_Report- 2_11.pdf [16 Des, 2016].

World Resources Institute (WRI). 2011. Moratorium Indonesia: Kesempatan bagi Hutan dan Industri. [On line]. From: http://pdf.wri.org/indonesias_ moratorium_ id.pdf [12 Des, 2016].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.01.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.