How Board Member’s Education Diversities and Financial Expertise Matter to Sustainability Report Disclosure: An Insight from Upper-echelon Theory

Rizka Fitriasari, Noorlailie Soewarno

Abstract


Companies are recently developing corporate governance practices in order to manage and monitor sustainability issues, especially the role of the board of directors in the context of sustainability reports. The board of directors must be geared with sufficient expertise so that they can run their roles and functions effectively. This study aims to discover the potential influence of board members’ education diversities and financial expertise on sustainability report disclosure from the perspectives of upper-echelon theory. This study examines 1276 board members of 220 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data was obtained from the firms’ sustainability reports and was analyzed using content analysis and multiple regression analysis. A checklist containing 91 CSR disclosure items based on the Global Reporting Initiative was utilized. Content analysis was used to extract the CSR disclosure items from the sustainability reports. Based on the regression analysis, only the board members’ financial expertise matters to the extent of disclosure of sustainability reports, while education diversities are not influential. This study is important because it uses upper echelons theory to ascertain the influence of specific board attributes, namely board members’ education diversities and financial expertise, on sustainability report disclosure. As a result, it provides important implications for corporate governance regulators and different stakeholders from the perspective of sustainability report disclosure.


Keywords


Sustainability Report Disclosure; Financial Expertise; Board Members’s Education; Upper-Echelon Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Qa’dan, M. B. and Suwaidan, M. S. 2019. Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), pp. 28–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0225.

Al-Mamun, A. and Seamer, M. 2020. Board of director attributes and CSR engagement in emerging economy firms: Evidence from across Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100749.

Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., and Abdelwahed, O. 2020. Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(6), pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4.

Cannella, B., Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. C. 2008. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford UK: Oxford university press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162073.001.0001.

Carson, C. M., Mosley, D. C., and Boyar, S. L. 2004. Performance gains through diverse top management teams. Team Performance Management, 10(5–6), pp. 121–126. DOI: 10.1108/13527590410556845.

Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., and Treviño, L. K. 2014. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibilityPolitical ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, pp. 197–232. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0001839213486984.

Crisóstomo, V. L., de Souza Freire, F., and De Vasconcellos, F. C. 2011. Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social responsibility journal, 7(2), 295-309.

Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467037.

Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., and Nieto, M. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 10(1), pp. 85–104. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-014-0141-9.

Fernández-Temprano, M. A. and Tejerina-Gaite, F. 2020. Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance; Bradford, 20(2), pp. 324–342. DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2019-0096.

Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Manajement: a stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

Freeman, Wicks, and Parmar. 2004. Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), pp. 364–369.

Friedman, M. F. 2007. The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profits. The New York times magazine, 32(173–178). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14.

Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), pp. 334–343.

Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper Echelons : The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 193–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258434.

Harjoto, M. A. and Wang, Y. 2020. Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2(6), pp. 965–985.

Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., and Paetzold, R. L. 2000. The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, pp. 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179.

Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), pp. 383–396. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729.

Homroy, S. and Slechten, A. 2019. Do Board Expertise and Networked Boards Affect Environmental Performance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3769-y.

Huang, S. K. 2013. The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), pp. 234–244. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1295.

Jo, H. and Harjoto, M. A. 2011. Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), pp. 351–383. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y.

Kaur, R. and Singh, B. 2018. CEOs’ characteristics and firm performance: A study of Indian firms. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 185-200.

Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., and Siddiqui, J. 2013. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: evidence from an emerging economy. Bussiness Ethics, 114, pp. 207–223.

Liao, L., Luo, L., and Tang, Q. 2014. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. Br. Account. Rev, 47, pp. 409–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.

Lock, I. and Seele, P. 2017. Measuring Credibility Perceptions in CSR Communication: A Scale Development to Test Readers’ Perceived Credibility of CSR Reports. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 584–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917707592.

Majeed, S., Aziz, T., and Saleem, S. 2015. The Effect of Corporate Governance Elements on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: An Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies at KSE Pakistan. Journal Financial Study, 3(4), pp. 530–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs3040530.

Mathews, M. . 2000. The Development of Social and Environmental Accounting Research 1995-2000. Available at: http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Colleges/College of Business/School of Accountancy/Documents/Discussion Papers/205.pdf.

Michelon, G. and Parbonetti, A. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance volume, 16, pp. 477–509. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.

Naciti, V. 2019. Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 237, p. 117727. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727.

Said, R., Hj Zainuddin, Y., and Haron, H. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social responsibility journal, 5(2), 212-226.

Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Yugang, C., Ullah, F., Li, H. X., and Ye, Z. 2020. Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: new insights from the upper echelons perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), pp. 1–16.

Sun, L. and Rakhman, F. 2013. CFO financial expertise and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from S&P 500 companies. International Journal of Law and Management.

Sun, H., Zhu, J., Wang, T., and Wang, Y. 2021. MBA CEOs and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125801.

Testa, M. and D’Amato, A. 2017. Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), pp. 221–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2016-0031.

Umukoro, O. E. Uwuigbe, O. R., Uwuigbe, U., Adegboye, A., Ajetunmobi, O., and Nwaze, C. 2019. Board Expertise and Sustainability Reporting in Listed Banks in Nigeria. IOP Conference: Series Earth and Environmental Science, 331(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/331/1/012048.

Uyar, A., Kılıç Karamahmutoğlu, M., Köseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., and Karaman, A. S. 2020. The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714.

Velte, P. 2019. Do CEO incentives and characteristics influence corporate social responsibility (CSR) and vice versa? A literature review. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), pp. 1293–1323. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0145.

Velte, P. and Stawinoga, M. 2020. Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR‑related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical‑quantitative research findings. Journal of Management Control, 31, pp. 333–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00308-x.

Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B. 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 303–319. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::aid-smj869>3.0.co;2-g.

Waheed, A. and Malik, Q. A. 2019. Board characteristics, ownership concentration and firms’ performance: A contingent theoretical based approach. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), pp. 146–165. DOI: 10.1108/SAJBS-03-2018-0031.

Waldman, D. A. and Siegel, D. 2008. Defining the socially responsible leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), pp. 117–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.008.

Wang, G., Holmes, R M., Oh, I.-S., and Zhu, W. 2016. Do CEOs Matter to Firm Strategic Actions and Firm Performance? A Meta-Analytic Investigation Based on Upper Echelons Theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), pp. 775–862. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12140.

Wang, Y., Hazen, B. T., and Mollenkopf, D. A. 2018. Consumer value considerations and adoption of remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(2), pp. 480–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0437.

Wei, L. Q. and Ling, Y. 2015. CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research. Elsevier Inc., 68(6), pp. 1157–1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.010.

Widiastuty, E. and Soewarno, N. 2019. CSR Expenditure and Company Performance: Charity or Signal? Evidence from Indonesia. Quality, Innovation, Prosperity, 23(3), pp. 22–37. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v23i3.1273.

Wiersema and Bantel. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 3(1), pp. 91–121.

Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., and Tetlock, P. E. 2011. The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal Manag. J, 54(6).

Yuan, Y., Tian, G., Lu, L., and Yu, Y. 2017. CEO ability and corporate social responsibility. Journal Bussiness Ethics, 157(2).

Zhuang, Y., Chang, X., and Lee, Y. 2018. Board composition and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Chinese public firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.3390/su10082752.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.